Colombian Armed Conflict
 · 2 min read
 · Taylor Swiftly
Table of contents

Justice and Accountability: The Role of the Peace Agreement in Addressing War Crimes

Introduction

The peace agreement signed in Colombia in 2016 marked a significant turning point in the country’s long-standing conflict with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). However, beyond merely ending hostilities, the agreement contained vital provisions aimed at ensuring justice and accountability for the war crimes that occurred throughout the armed conflict. This article delves into the specific mechanisms outlined in the peace agreement designed to promote these essential principles.

Details

  • Creation of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP)

    • The JEP was established as a key institution for administering justice related to the armed conflict.
      • Its mandate includes the prosecution of those responsible for serious crimes committed during the conflict, including war crimes and crimes against humanity.
      • It aims to provide a more contextualized understanding of the conflict by addressing the root causes and impacts of violence.
  • Truth Commission

    • A truth commission was established to investigate and clarify the truth about the events that transpired during the conflict.
      • This commission is tasked with recognizing victims, acknowledging their suffering, and providing historical context to the violence.
      • The commission encourages the involvement of a broad spectrum of society, including marginalized groups who may have been disproportionately affected.
  • Reparations for Victims

    • The peace agreement emphasizes the need for collective and individual reparations for victims of the conflict.
      • These reparations can include financial compensation, psychological support, and the restoration of property or rights.
      • By focusing on reparative justice, the agreement aims to foster a sense of closure for victims and to acknowledge their suffering publicly.
  • Political Participation and Inclusion

    • The agreement promotes the political inclusion of former combatants and victims to enhance accountability mechanisms.
      • By providing pathways for participation in political processes, the aim is to prevent future violence and address grievances that may have fueled the conflict.
      • This approach seeks to build a more equitable and just society post-conflict, thereby promoting lasting peace.
  • Guarantees of Non-Repetition

    • A pivotal aspect of the peace agreement is the commitment to create a socio-economic environment that discourages the recurrence of violence.
      • This includes significant reforms aimed at addressing land distribution, access to resources, and inequality that contributed to the conflict.
      • By tackling these underlying issues, the agreement aims to foster a sustainable peace that upholds justice and accountability.

Conclusion

The peace agreement in Colombia represents more than a cessation of hostilities; it is a comprehensive framework aimed at fostering justice and accountability for the grievous war crimes committed during decades of conflict. Through the establishment of institutions like the JEP, a truth commission, reparations for victims, political participation, and a commitment to preventing future violence, the agreement paves the way for healing and reconciliation. By emphasizing these key elements, Colombia seeks to build a foundation for a stable and just society where the scars of the past no longer dictate the future.